Анархизъм: Разлика между версии

</ref><ref>In a society developed on these lines, the voluntary associations which already now begin to cover all the fields of human activity would take a still greater extension so as to substitute themselves for the state in all its functions."&nbsp;Peter Kropotkin. „Anarchism“ from the Encyclopædia Britannica</ref>. Някои автори ги описват и като общества базирани на нейерархични свободни асоциации между хората<ref>„as many anarchists have stressed, it is not government as such that they find objectionable, but the hierarchical forms of government associated with the nation state.“ Judith Suissa.''Anarchism and Education: a Philosophical Perspective''. Routledge. New York. 2006. p. 7</ref><ref name=":0">„IAF principles“.&nbsp;[[International of Anarchist Federations]]. Archived from&nbsp;the original&nbsp;on 5 January 2012.&nbsp;<q>The IAF – IFA fights for&nbsp;: the abolition of all forms of authority whether economical, political, social, religious, cultural or sexual.</q></ref>. &nbsp;Според анархизма, държавата е нежелана, ненужна и вредна<ref>Slevin, Carl. „Anarchism.“&nbsp;''The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Politics''. Ed. Iain McLean and Alistair McMillan. Oxford University Press, 2003.</ref>. Анархизмът застава в опозиция на властта и йерархичната организация във всички човешки отношения.<ref name=":0" /><ref>"My use of the word hierarchy in the subtitle of this work is meant to be provocative. There is a strong theoretical need to contrast hierarchy with the more widespread use of the words class and State; careless use of these terms can produce a dangerous simplification of social reality. To use the words hierarchy, class, and State interchangeably, as many social theorists do, is insidious and obscurantist. This practice, in the name of a „classless“ or „libertarian“ society, could easily conceal the existence of hierarchical relationships and a hierarchical sensibility, both of which-even in the absence of economic exploitation or political coercion-would serve to perpetuate unfreedom."&nbsp;[[Murray Bookchin]].&nbsp;''The Ecology of Freedom: the emergence and dissolution of Hierarchy. CHESHIRE BOOKS''&nbsp;Palo Alto. 1982. Pg. 3</ref> Като следствие анархизмът се противопоставя на всяка форма на [[Държава|държавност]].<ref>{{Цитат уеб| уеб_адрес= https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/michail-bakunin-statism-and-anarchy | заглавие= |достъп_дата = |фамилно_име= Бакунин|първо_име=Михаил |дата= |труд= |издател= |език=en |цитат= If there is a State, there must be domination of one class by another and, as a result, slavery; the State without slavery is unthinkable – and this is why we are the enemies of the State.

</ref> и по-голямата част от анархистката [[Икономика|икономическа]] визия и анархистката [[Общество|социална]] философия отразяват анти-авторитарни интерпретации на [[Комунизъм|комунизма]], [[Колективизъм|колективизма]], [[Синдикализъм|синдикализма]], [[Мутуализъм|мутуализма]] и икономиката на участието.<ref>The anarchists were unanimous in subjecting authoritarian socialism to a barrage of severe criticism. At the time when they made violent and satirical attacks these were not entirely well founded, for those to whom they were addressed were either primitive or „vulgar“ communists, whose thought had not yet been fertilized by Marxist humanism, or else, in the case of Marx and Engels themselves, were not as set on authority and state control as the anarchists made out." Daniel Guerin,''Anarchism: From Theory to Practice''&nbsp;(New York: Monthly Review Press, 1970)</ref>